
San Antonio Mayor Gina Ortiz Jones suffered a bruising defeat Thursday as the ten different members of Metropolis Council voted to maintain the present metropolis guidelines governing how members of the physique suggest new ordinances for debate.
A bipartisan coalition together with District 5 Councilwoman Teri Castillo, District 7 Councilwoman Marina Alderete Gavito, D10 District 10 Councilman Marc Whyte and first-term District 9 Councilwoman Misty Spears put the merchandise ahead for a vote.
Final month, Jones advocated altering the outdated guidelines so no proposal paperwork, referred to as Council Consideration Requests (CCRs), filed by council members previous to her time in workplace might come up for a vote. On the time, each member of council voted to reject the alteration.
After that vote, the four-member coalition filed a memo demanding Thursday’s full debate of the CCR guidelines. The dialogue set the stage for Jones’ second defeat on the matter.
Throughout Thursday’s debate, Whyte mentioned the rule change Jones sought would drive council members to refile CCRs that aren’t heard earlier than the tip of their time period — a course of that would take so long as a yr and a half.
“Think about being in your final time period in workplace,” Whyte mentioned. “Why would you even file a CCR that would take a yr or a yr and a half to be labored on, if the minute you’re gone and termed out the CCR expires, and the method must begin over once more? I imply, chances are you’ll as properly not even do the work at that time.”
Nonetheless, first-term District 4 Councilman Edward Mungia disagreed and put forth an modification that might have declared CCRs authored by a member now not in workplace “expired.” CCRs the place 4 of the 5 signatories had been now not in workplace additionally would even be tossed below Mungia’s urged rule change.
Though first-term District 6 Councilman Ric Galvan and District 1 Councilwoman Sukh Kaur each mentioned they’re open to having a extra in-depth dialogue about how the CCR course of might enhance, they argued the language in Munguia’s modification might trigger issues if not correctly examined.
“I believe there’s a bigger dialog about what the issues that really feel are vital … however I believe we will proceed with the earlier CCRs that had been below the earlier ordinance, after which we should always have a dialog about how we need to suggest something new,” Kaur mentioned.
Subscribe to SA Present newsletters.
Observe us: Apple Information | Google Information | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Fb | Twitter | Or join our RSS Feed
This text seems in Sep. 18-Oct. 1.