AUSTIN — A brand new Texas regulation supplies public college lecturers with immunity from prosecution for violating the U.S. Structure’s First Modification clause calling for separation of church and state, Texas Training Commissioner Mike Morath testified Monday in entrance of state lawmakers.
The revelation got here throughout a tense assembly of the Texas Home Committee on Public Training, which met to conduct hearings on new college vouchers along with new lesson plans and applications for the state’s public colleges.
Through the listening to, State Rep. James Talarico, an Austin-area Democrat, grilled Morarth on new instructional supplies revised below Home Invoice 1605.
Amongst different issues, HB 1605, handed final 12 months by the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature, was designed to offer lecturers with state-approved lesson plans and make these supplies accessible to folks through an internet portal. Nonetheless, critics cost that Christian evangelicals have used the invoice to insert Christian-centric classes into the authorized classes.
Texas purchased an elementary college studying curriculum from a nationwide writer final 12 months, and a “small group” on the Texas Training Company was tasked with eradicating massive sections on different religions, together with Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism and all mentions of the Islamic prophet Muhammed, in accordance with Talarico. These omitted supplies had been changed with tales from the Bible, he added.
Morath verified Talarico’s assertions throughout his testimony in entrance of the committee.
Though the brand new lesson plans had been launched 4 days after the Texas Republican Occasion handed a platform calling on the Texas Legislature and the State Board of Training to require instruction on the Bible, Morath maintains the timing was coincidental.
“Are you fearful that if Texas Public Faculty lecturers use this new state curriculum, they are going to violate the Institution Clause by educating Bible tales in public colleges?” Talarico requested Morath, who shook his head in disagreement.
“Then why does the invoice, on the backside of web page 5, explicitly give lecturers who use this new curriculum immunity for violating the Institution Clause in america Structure?” Morath deflected, saying he did not perceive Talarico’s query.
If the Texas State Board of Training approves the brand new theocratic curriculum, then colleges that undertake and implement it into their studying courses will obtain further state funding. It is value mentioning that Texas ranks on the backside with regards to public college spending per pupil.
Talarico additionally questioned how geared up Texas lecturers are to cope with powerful theological questions from college students who ask questions in regards to the resurrection of Jesus Christ or the Sermon on the Mount — each of that are included within the new curriculum.
“While you’re speaking about faith, once you’re speaking about religion, you are speaking about theology, you are working with fireplace,” stated Talarico, who’s additionally a pupil of Austin’s Presbyterian Theological Seminary. “These are severe subjects — essentially the most severe matter in lots of our lives. And so, to me, this appears not solely reckless, but it surely appears it may do nice hurt to college students, whether or not they’re Christians or not.”
Even so, Republican state Rep. Matt Schaefer, additionally a member of the Home Committee on Public Training, stated he had no drawback with the proposed lesson plans.
“The world’s main religions didn’t have an equal affect on the founding perception methods for our nation,” stated Schaefer, who represents the Tyler space. “I do not assume we should always ever be ashamed of mentioning the identify Jesus in our curriculum or shying away from the position of Christianity in growing this nation, growing Western civilization.”
Subscribe to SA Present newsletters.
Observe us: Apple Information | Google Information | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Fb | Twitter| Or join our RSS Feed