Texas Tribune / Jordan Vonderhaar
A state official should resolve whether or not to just accept her personal company’s suggestion to finalize state Medicaid contracts that might influence the well being protection of almost 2 million Texans.
Join The Temporary, The Texas Tribune’s day by day e-newsletter that retains readers on top of things on essentially the most important Texas information.
Texas officers on Thursday rejected makes an attempt by a number of main insurers for needy households to cancel a proposal that might drop them from the state Medicaid program and shake up the protection of almost 2 million low-income Texans.
At problem are some $116 billion in Medicaid contracts that Texas Well being and Human Companies officers try to award by the top of the summer season, a plan introduced earlier this yr that has drawn broad criticism as a result of it could eradicate three main well being plans run for many years by the state’s premiere nonprofit kids’s hospitals.
Some 1.8 million Texans who obtain Medicaid protection from six managed care organizations throughout the state would lose their present well being plans and be shifted to new insurers subsequent yr if the choice stands.
Medicaid STAR and CHIP packages cowl the price of routine, acute and emergency medical visits. STAR is primarily for pregnant ladies, low-income kids and their caretakers. CHIP supplies well being care to low-income kids whose household’s revenue is simply too excessive for Medicaid, which has a number of the lowest revenue limits within the nation.
Thursday’s choice is a big step towards finalizing the plan, which might:
* Scale back the variety of managed care organizations that administer the state’s Medicaid STAR and Kids’s Well being Insurance coverage Program
* Give contracts to extra for-profit corporations in most areas of the state
* End in a smaller variety of top-rated plans administering care
* Appeal to new nationwide plans to exchange native managed care organizations, or MCOs, that traditionally served some areas
The well being plans are anticipated to enchantment the choice, which places the way forward for the procurement — the time period for a brand new contract for the MCOs that run STAR and CHIP — squarely on the discretion of Texas Well being and Human Companies Government Commissioner Cecile E. Younger.
“We stay dissatisfied that the company continues to push ahead with what was proven this week … as a short-sighted, flawed and biased course of,” mentioned Craig Smith, CEO of Corpus Christi-based Driscoll Kids’s Well being Plan, one of many three kids’s hospital plans that might be dropped beneath the proposal and which might doubtless shut down if it’s finalized. “We admire the large response and testimony of South Texans combating to have their voices heard, and we’ll maintain combating on their behalf to serve our neighborhood.”
Younger has been beneath mounting strain from lawmakers, enterprise leaders, well being plans and the residents they cowl to ditch it and revamp a course of many describe as unfair, unlawful and antiquated.
“Do not let company greed take away excellent and caring look after our youngsters,” McAllen resident Angelica Mata wrote to lawmakers earlier this week. Mata was one in every of about 500 individuals who submitted written testimony decrying the plan throughout a Texas Home listening to.
If the protesting MCOs get their method and the contracting plan is canceled, it could be the company’s third unsuccessful try and finalize new contracts for STAR and CHIP managed care organizations since they had been first signed a dozen years in the past.
No matter what Younger decides, the matter will doubtless find yourself in court docket given the uproar, division and rising uncertainty across the legitimacy of the procurement.
No deadline for a callCritics say the procurement course of doesn’t adhere to state legal guidelines that, over time, have sought to favor well being plans that had invested in and been well-received by their communities, or which can be tailor-made to distinctive inhabitants teams like kids, and that might permit the best continuity of care.
In addition they say all the course of was tainted by the early launch of some aggressive bid proposal info to one of many eventual winners within the procurement, an error the state acknowledged in emails to some well being plans however maintains was not unlawful and didn’t have an effect on the end result. Younger instructed lawmakers beneath questioning earlier this week that the company was dealing with the matter internally however didn’t elaborate.
On Tuesday, Younger and different company officers testified earlier than the Texas Home Human Companies Committee that the company complies with state regulation governing contract procurements. These embrace necessities that the state give a good shake to all candidates, whether or not new to the state or longtime contractors, and due to this fact can’t give any benefit to plans like the youngsters’s hospital-affiliated plans which have observe information within the state.
Younger didn’t tackle what she plans to do in regards to the present procurement and has declined to debate it publicly, saying she is restricted to what she will be able to say till the method is over.
In a letter to lawmakers earlier this week and obtained by The Texas Tribune, Younger declined to handle considerations in regards to the newest STAR/CHIP contract proposal however mentioned Medicaid recipients wouldn’t expertise an interruption in care throughout any transition.
Younger has no deadline for deciding whether or not to uphold the choice by her company’s procurement division, cancel it and begin over, or formally delay it till lawmakers can reply to it once they meet in session subsequent yr.
Medicaid managed care contracts are routinely the most costly contracts states pay for with taxes, and Texas’ contracts are among the many largest within the nation.
Amongst those that can be affected by the proposed procurement are a collective 700,000 households, pregnant ladies and youngsters coated by Cook dinner Kids’s Well being Plan within the state’s Tarrant service space, Texas Kids’s Well being Plan within the Harris area, and Driscoll Well being Plan in South Texas, all which fashioned when the state’s CHIP program was created 20 years in the past.
Cook dinner Kids’s and Driscoll Well being plans would doubtless each shut down if the brand new plan is finalized. The hospitals themselves aren’t at risk, they mentioned. In an emailed assertion Thursday, officers from Cook dinner’s plan blasted the method as “flawed from the start” and promised to pursue “each authorized possibility accessible.”
“We’re assured within the power of our case and imagine we’ll prevail,” the assertion learn. “We all know each kid’s life is sacred, and we’ll proceed to meet our promise of bettering the well-being of each little one entrusted to our care and inside our communities.”
Michael Murphy, president of the nonprofit Texas Kids’s Well being Plan based mostly in Houston, mentioned he was “deeply dissatisfied within the place that HHSC has taken.”
The 25-year-old plan covers some 450,000 kids and pregnant ladies.
“To disrupt and jeopardize the care of 450,000 of the state’s most susceptible kids and pregnant ladies regardless of Texas Kids’s Well being Plan’s 25-year observe file of sturdy member desire, superior high quality and its steadfast dedication to serving this inhabitants is perplexing and particularly worrisome in gentle of the distinctive set of challenges they constantly encounter,” Murphy mentioned in an emailed assertion to the Tribune.
Murphy mentioned the corporate would enchantment the choice and “pursue all authorized treatments mandatory as HHS has violated the regulation throughout this course of.”
“We will even go away no stone unturned in defending and advocating for our members and the households we serve,” he mentioned.
In the meantime, a handful of nationwide for-profit chains would considerably develop their foothold in these markets — in a single case rising from serving only one area of Texas to seven — whereas the others are both diminished or pressured out.
The change would pressure almost half of the Medicaid STAR and CHIP enrollees within the state out of their present well being plan, doubtlessly inflicting modifications in suppliers, pharmacies, and psychological well being companies.
It will additionally set off an enormous effort by the state to tell all these households of the change, which might take impact late subsequent yr if the plan holds.
Mounting bipartisan strain
The Medicaid contracts outlined within the procurement had been awarded based mostly on a course of that scored plans on written questions and an oral examination, after the MCOs had proved that they might successfully serve the areas for which that they had utilized.
When the scores had been added up, the 4 top-scoring plans acquired many of the accessible contracts: Aetna, United, Molina and Blue Cross Blue Defend every acquired seven contracts, essentially the most allowed per MCO, and increasing their foothold in Texas.
The result despatched shockwaves all through the Texas well being care neighborhood and led to escalating requires a better look, each on the total procurement course of at HHS and particularly on the STAR/CHIP procurement — which was introduced in March after a 15-month analysis course of.
“There are people who find themselves genuinely involved about this throughout Texas,” state Rep. Ana-Maria Ramos, D-Richardson, mentioned throughout a Home committee listening to earlier this week. “Why was that call made? Persons are actually up in arms.”
On Tuesday, half a dozen Tarrant County state representatives signed a letter to Younger, protesting the impact the plan would have on Fort Value-based Cook dinner Kids’s Well being Plan and asking that she delay the procurement till lawmakers return to session in January.
“It seems that the current award issues have neglected essential elements reminiscent of observe file, neighborhood funding, and total worth supplied,” the letter reads.
The letter was circulated by state Rep. Nicole Collier, D-Fort Value, whose district consists of Cook dinner Kids’s Hospital, and signed by 4 Democrats and two Republicans.
The lawmakers requested Younger to take away the restrict on what number of managed care organizations can serve in a specific area — a restrict imposed by HHS firstly of the method and blamed partially for its final result.
The letter comes on the heels of the same plea to delay or cancel the procurement that was despatched to Younger two weeks in the past by state Sen. Tan Parker, R-Flower Mound, and state Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, who expressed “grave considerations” about its potential to have “long-lasting results on neighborhood well being infrastructure.”
“This drastic change comes at a time when stability and continuity in well being care are extra vital than ever,” the letter reads.
And earlier this yr, a bipartisan group of South Texas lawmakers signed the same letter in protection of Driscoll Kids’s Well being Plan, which funds 75% of the ladies’s well being specialists within the area.
HHSC tells lawmakers their palms are tied
Additionally on Tuesday, a bipartisan group of lawmakers grilled Younger and different HHSC officers throughout a gathering of the Texas Home Committee on Human Companies, charged with inspecting how the state runs its Medicaid managed care contracts after the STAR/CHIP procurement started garnering criticism.
State Rep. Christian Manuel, D-Beaumont, criticized the proposal, saying that altering the Medicaid plans accessible in his rural district would make challenges with well being care entry even worse if the brand new firm doesn’t perceive the distinctive wants of communities the place residents dwell an hour away from the closest hospital and incessantly surprise if they will get life-saving care, he mentioned.
“Are they going to have the ability to perceive the precise wants earlier than they only are available and have individuals in a tizzy over what’s going to occur?” he mentioned. “As a result of there are already these fears, and that is exacerbating that.”
Below questioning from Home members this week, Younger and Molina, the company’s procurement director, mentioned the company hears the considerations however is hamstrung by state legal guidelines that require the company to create a course of that’s honest and aggressive to all candidates.
State regulation “principally requires us to place one thing out that’s honest to everybody, which makes it very laborious to provide additional factors for somebody who’s already within the area doing one thing, as a result of then it’s not honest and everybody will not be judged the identical method. And we battle with that,” Molina instructed the lawmakers. “If there’s a higher solution to do it, for those who might put it within the regulation, that might make it a lot simpler. We’re boxed right into a nook utilizing a state regulation that has to use to all the pieces.”
A technique an applicant can get round that, Younger instructed lawmakers, is by together with their previous efficiency of their written pitches and essay questions through the analysis course of. However historic efficiency available in the market isn’t a proper consideration through the course of, Younger mentioned.
“Am I lacking one thing right here?” mentioned state Rep. Sweet Noble, R-Lucas. “Why would you throw out your expertise, at the least in some half? And I get that we do love the alternatives that Texas affords within the free market, and I am not towards that. I simply suppose that previous expertise ought to be at the least … a part of the equation.”
Home Well being Committee Chair Stephanie Klick, R-Fort Value, mentioned the legal guidelines clearly have to be up to date in the event that they’re establishing a no-win contracting scenario for HHS. With over 40,000 contracts, procurement is among the most essential capabilities of HHSC and guaranteeing the integrity of the method is a prime precedence, officers there say.
“It appears to me that while you’re high quality, and you’ve got any person within the area already and so they’re performing properly, they’re being put at a drawback, and that doesn’t appear honest,” Klick mentioned. “We’d like some modernization.”
Disclosure: Aetna, United Healthcare, Molina Healthcare and Blue Cross Blue Defend of Texas have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partially by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full checklist of them right here.
This text initially appeared within the Texas Tribune.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and fascinating Texans on state politics and coverage. Study extra at texastribune.org.
Subscribe to SA Present newsletters.
Comply with us: Apple Information | Google Information | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Fb | Twitter| Or join our RSS Feed
