Texas Tribune / Bob Daemmrich
Texas Supreme Court docket Justice John Devine, far left, with fellow judges on the Home ground in Austin in 2013.
Join The Temporary, The Texas Tribune’s each day publication that retains readers up to the mark on essentially the most important Texas information.
Talking to a bunch of East Texas voters in September, state Supreme Court docket Justice John Devine forged himself because the antidote to his “brainwashed” colleagues on the all-Republican bench.
Their “Huge Regulation” backgrounds, he stated, had taught them to fret extra about authorized procedures — “standing, timeliness, or no matter else” — than their obligation to uphold the Structure.
“At instances I really feel like they’d sacrifice the Republic for the sake of the method,” Devine stated within the speech, a recording of which was obtained by The Texas Tribune. “My concern is that all of them bow right down to the altar of course of slightly than to constancy to the Structure. And after I say that, it’s not meant to be malice in direction of my colleagues. I believe it’s how they have been educated — how they have been brainwashed.”
Significantly egregious, he stated, was their ruling towards Jeff Youthful, a former Texas Home candidate who had for years waged a public warfare towards his ex-wife over their younger little one’s gender id. In 2022, Youthful requested the courtroom to cease his ex from transferring their little one to California, which had lately handed a refuge regulation shielding mother and father fleeing from states that limit gender-transitioning look after minors from prosecution.
The courtroom declined to listen to Youthful’s lawsuit, which two justices argued was riddled with errors and primarily based on “tenuous hypothesis” that the ex-wife would violate a standing courtroom order that already prevented her from pursuing gender-transition therapies for the kid.
Devine was nonetheless offended at his colleagues when he spoke on the September occasion.
“I am not going to face right here sanctimoniously and say, ‘Effectively he didn’t cross a T or dot an I,’” he stated of Youthful. “We’re speaking about nice constitutional points right here that may decide whether or not we survive as a consultant republic or not. Are we going to only have it stolen from us? Over course of for crying out loud?”
The audio is a uncommon glimpse into Texas’ usually insular excessive courtroom and window into the judicial philosophy of Devine, a former anti-abortion activist whose tenure as a jurist has been formed by his spiritual beliefs and deeply conservative politics — generally, his critics say, on the expense of his impartiality.
These issues are actually the main focus of an unusually heated main election for the comparatively unknown Texas Supreme Court docket. Devine is the one justice with a challenger within the statewide, March 5 race, and his opponent, Second District Court docket of Appeals Decide Brian Walker, has centered his marketing campaign on questions on Devine’s ethics relationship again to the mid-Nineteen Nineties.
“We’ve got a choose who simply continues to violate moral guidelines and the code of judicial conduct that is written by the Texas Supreme Court docket itself,” Walker stated in an interview. “And if the folks can’t belief that judges are going to observe even their very own guidelines, then they’re going to have little or no confidence that the rule of regulation really will prevail.”
For 30 years, Devine has been a stalwart of the spiritual proper. He claimed on the marketing campaign path that he was arrested 37 instances at anti-abortion protests within the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties, and says church-state separation is a “fantasy” that has shrouded America’s true Christian roots.
As a justice, Devine has earned reward from conservatives and reputation as a bulwark between spiritual liberty and the activist judges they really feel threaten it.
“He is very principled and keen about his position, and about standing agency and exercising that position even when somebody has a unique opinion or they’re attempting to place some political strain on him,” stated Jonathan Saenz, president of Texas Values. “To me, it is a reflection of what the folks of Texas need and anticipate.”
However to others, Devine’s tenure and September feedback replicate what they are saying is a decadeslong erosion of norms that when dissuaded jurists from airing their political grievances or talking on subjects that might in the future be in entrance of the courtroom out of concern in regards to the look of bias.
“Judges often did not communicate that means,” stated Sanford Levinson, a longtime authorized scholar on the College of Texas at Austin College of Regulation. “And I do not suppose that trash discuss is a very wholesome phenomenon.”
That’s not an obvious concern for Devine, who in his September remarks additionally took intention at various Texas officers over quite a lot of authorized or political disputes. Texas’ all-GOP Court docket of Prison Appeals — which dominated that Lawyer Basic Ken Paxton’s workplace couldn’t unilaterally prosecute native voting crimes — is managed by “RINOs” and “trans-Republicans,” Devine stated. He additionally railed towards Democratic leaders in Harris County, accusing them of “Democrat soiled tips” and attempting to “bastardize our election code” to steal elections.
Devine didn’t reply to interview requests or an inventory of questions, and a Texas Supreme Court docket spokesperson declined to touch upon excerpts of Devine’s speech.
His feedback have been criticized by Walker who, within the lead as much as the March 5 main, has additionally blasted Devine for lacking half of oral arguments as he campaigned this yr; auctioning personal excursions of the Texas Supreme Court docket for a 2023 GOP fundraiser; and never recusing himself from circumstances by which Walker argues that Devine had conflicts of curiosity.
Earlier this month, the Tribune reported that Devine didn’t recuse himself in a high-profile intercourse abuse lawsuit towards Southern Baptist chief Paul Pressler and his former regulation companion Jared Woodfill. The plaintiff within the case, a former worker of Woodfill and Pressler’s agency, stated he was sexually abused by Pressler on the similar time that Devine additionally labored for the agency.
Devine has defended his resolution to not recuse himself within the intercourse abuse lawsuit, beforehand telling the Tribune that he had no monetary or different ties to the lawsuit or Woodfill and Pressler’s agency. He’s additionally downplayed his absences from oral arguments this yr, calling it a “non-issue” and pure consequence of getting an elected judiciary.
“The actual fact is we’re elected and a part of our job is to run for reelection,” Devine advised Bloomberg Regulation, which first reported on his absences this month. “It doesn’t do you any good in case you don’t get reelected.”
Cast by a motion
After transferring to the Houston space from Indiana within the Eighties, Devine enrolled on the South Texas School of Regulation and jumped head-first into Texas’ nascent anti-abortion motion.
“It was very small and fragmented — nothing in comparison with what it’s now,” stated Joe Pojman, govt director of Texas Alliance For Life. “We have been very hopeful. However there hadn’t been a lot completed tangibly at that time.”
With comparatively few highly effective allies or methods to unfold their message, some within the motion turned their consideration towards protests outdoors clinics. Amongst them was Devine, who later stated that he served 34 days in jail for blocking the doorway to an abortion clinic throughout one protest.
One inflection level got here in 1992, Pojman stated, when Eileen O’Neill, a state district choose in Harris County, barred protesters from being inside 100 ft of abortion clinics forward of the Republican Nationwide Conference held in Houston that yr. It was an “insulting” ruling, Pojman stated, that they believed trampled on their First Modification rights.
Later that yr, the then-32-year-old Devine challenged O’Neill as a write-in candidate. Centered on the idea of “Christianity in American Regulation,” his marketing campaign was supported by figures comparable to Steven Hotze, an anti-gay activist and longtime powerbroker in Houston’s conservative Christian motion.
Devine additionally confronted opposition: Forward of the election, 11 native Republican precinct chairs issued a letter opposing his endorsement by the state and native GOP, saying Devine didn’t honor the “wall between church and state.” Devine obtained some-40,000 write-in votes — a neighborhood file, however not sufficient to win.
Two years later, he once more challenged O’Neill, casting her as an incompetent and unethical choose who was “absent from the bench virtually as a lot as she has been current.” (Now, in his main problem, Walker is attacking Devine for lacking 28 of fifty oral arguments earlier than the courtroom this time period.)
In a Republican wave that was bolstered by straight-ticket voting in Harris County and anti-Clinton sentiment, Devine received the judgeship by a half of a share level — a victory, he stated, for the “little folks like myself” towards the “bar affiliation” and its “conceited attorneys.”
Quickly after taking the bench in Harris County, Devine adorned his courtroom with a duplicate of the Ten Commandments and spearheaded the refurbishment of a monument outdoors of a county courthouse that featured a Bible. Each strikes drew lawsuits and controversy that Devine dismissed as assaults on spiritual liberty.
“We’re at warfare now over the systematic elimination of Christian custom from civil authorities,” he stated in 2004, after a choose sided with a girl who sued over the Bible monument. “This is only one extra battle. In the event that they take the Bible, the battle will proceed for the guts and soul of America.”
In 1996, Devine used his courtroom for an after-hours occasion to announce a congressional marketing campaign, incomes a sanction by the State Fee on Judicial Conduct for utilizing the “status of judicial workplace to advance the personal pursuits of the choose or others.” And later that yr, he presided over a lawsuit between a serious labor union and U.S. Congressman Steve Stockman over political commercials. Devine acknowledged that the end result of the case may have an effect on his ongoing marketing campaign for a congressional district close to Stockman’s, however declined to recuse himself till the following day — and after utilizing the listening to to publicly blast the union.
Devine misplaced that congressional race, however was reelected as a Harris County state district choose and, in 1999, ran for the Texas Court docket of Prison Appeals on a promise to be “quick on phrases, however lengthy on sentences.” He misplaced, however returned to district courtroom till 2002, when he resigned to run for Harris County Lawyer.
Throughout that race, Devine was criticized by the Texas Ethics Fee, which discovered that he had not disclosed his place as president of an actual property firm on monetary kinds relationship again to 1994. The State Fee on Judicial Conduct additionally stated that Devine could have violated different guidelines by itemizing his county cellphone quantity for the enterprise.
Devine corrected his monetary disclosures however denied utilizing his workplace for private enterprise. He finally misplaced within the 2002 main.
‘Devine intervention’All through the aughts, Devine stored at his quest for elected workplace. He misplaced a second congressional race, in 2004, throughout which his marketing campaign was accused by three GOP figures of mailing phony endorsements on their behalf. His 2006 bid for the Texas Home failed, as did his 2010 marketing campaign for a Montgomery County judgeship.
Nonetheless undeterred in 2011, Devine introduced his problem to incumbent Texas Supreme Court docket Justice David Medina within the statewide GOP main.
Devine’s marketing campaign targeted closely on the choice by him and his spouse, Nubia, to hold a seventh little one to time period regardless of medical doctors warning that the kid and Nubia may die. The kid died virtually instantly, however Nubia Devine survived.
Alongside the best way, he picked up endorsements from spiritual figures comparable to David Barton, a distinguished Texas activist who, like Devine, falsely claims that church-state separation is a “fantasy.” Additionally backing Devine was Texas’ Tea Celebration motion, which had coalesced round intense fears that President Barack Obama would use his second time period to persecute Christians en masse.
The temper of the grassroots was mirrored by a San Angelo girl who, in a letter to her native paper, in contrast American Christians to Jews in Nazi Germany and begged for a “Devine intervention.”
“If we do not get again to our Christian rules, just like the Ten Commandments and honoring the Structure of the USA, we’re misplaced and so are our kids and grandchildren,” she wrote.
What adopted was a dark-red, anti-establishment wave. Tea Celebration darling Ted Cruz shocked the nation by beating Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst in a GOP runoff for a U.S. Senate seat. Donna Campbell, a little-known emergency room doctor, ousted a 20-year incumbent within the Texas Senate.
Devine beat Medina by 6 factors in a runoff and cruised to victory within the November 2012 basic election.
The grassroots’ jurist
Devine’s rise to the courtroom got here at a pivotal second for the motion that cast him.
By 2012, Texas — led by then-Lawyer Basic Greg Abbott — was within the throes of an all-out authorized warfare with the Obama administration, continuously taking his administration to courtroom over environmental guidelines, the Reasonably priced Care Act or different insurance policies that GOP critics decried as federal overreach. Devine’s election additionally coincided with the expansion of a broader conservative, Christian authorized motion that has since been ascendent throughout the nation.
Devine has confirmed an ally of that motion: Since taking the bench, he has continued to reward “Judeo-Christian rules” because the bedrock of the nation’s founding. And he has at instances been a key dissent from his colleagues on points favored by the Spiritual Proper.
Simply earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court docket’s acknowledged a constitutional proper to same-sex marriage in 2015, Devine issued a 15-page dissent by which he criticized his colleagues’ resolution in a separate lawsuit involving same-sex {couples}. At problem have been two girls who married in Massachusetts and, after transferring to Texas, have been granted a divorce in Tarrant County.
The state appealed, arguing the couple had no proper to divorce as a result of their union was by no means legitimate beneath Texas regulation. The courtroom majority later sided with the appeals courtroom, ruling that the state had no standing to sue as a result of it had did not intervene when the divorce was in trial courtroom.
The following yr, Devine issued a lone dissent after the courtroom’s majority declined to listen to a authorized problem to the Metropolis of Houston’s resolution to increase marriage advantages to the spouses of homosexual and lesbian metropolis staff.
Texas, Devine wrote in his dissent, had an extended historical past of dictating spousal advantages so as to encourage procreation or different societal items.
“Absolutely the State could restrict spousal employment advantages to spouses of the other intercourse,” he wrote. “Solely these spouses are able to procreation inside their marriage, and the State has an curiosity in encouraging such procreation.”
Devine’s dissent was praised by conservative leaders, together with Abbott and Paxton, who publicly criticized the courtroom’s resolution and campaigned for Devine’s colleagues to take up his place.
In a uncommon transfer, the Texas Supreme Court docket finally revisited the problem, unanimously ruling in 2017 that the best to marry doesn’t “entail any explicit bundle of tax advantages, worker fringe advantages or testimonial privileges.”
Saenz, of Texas Values, was concerned in that dispute, which he stated catalyzed Devine’s repute in conservative Christian circles as a defender of spiritual liberty who “just isn’t going to be pushed round, bullied or purchased.”
In Devine, Saenz sees the reflection of a motion that has grown from the at-times disjointed power of the Tea Celebration period into one thing a lot stronger and higher organized. These voters, he stated, have been more and more attuned to the state’s judiciary. And in Texas, the place judges are elected in usually low-turnout primaries, they’ve wielded their voting energy to push courts towards their conservative authorized and political beliefs.
“Voters anticipate judges to observe the Structure on the state and the federal degree, and never see it as this residing, respiratory doc that they’ll change relying on what the info are of some case that won’t match their very own political concepts or agenda,” Saenz stated. “Judges like Justice Devine perceive that that is what the voters anticipate, that that is what his position is. And he is very dedicated to it.”
Levinson, the longtime constitutional scholar, agreed that the judiciary has been more and more formed by voters. However he worries that development has additional polarized the nation, opening up a “Pandora’s field” that has allowed intense, existential rhetoric to cloud nuanced and much-needed conversations in regards to the position of faith in democracy.
“I believe that is a wonderfully respectable subject for dialogue and debate,” he stated. “However we appear incapable of getting it.”
This text initially appeared within the Texas Tribune.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and interesting Texans on state politics and coverage. Study extra at texastribune.org.
